User talk:Yann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  română  español  português  English  français  Nederlands  polski  galego  Simple English  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  العربية  فارسی  +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Immediately pseudo-procedurally closing this immediately after I voted to delete seems like a clear attempt at supervoting. I’m requesting that you revert this extremely bad close. If you don’t I’m going to report an abuse of administrative privilege. Dronebogus (talk) 23:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is really a bad close of DR, @Yann. There's no previous discussion for this photo and we are discussing on that page. There's some reason for deleting this per talk page.
Please revert your close, thank you.
@Dronebogus Lemonaka (talk) 09:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will once again ask you to reconsider this DR. Dronebogus (talk) 20:10, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I would like to know what is exact cause of deletion for this page? I thought it is normal and convenient to hold files about one publication at one category, in this case it is one Belarusian-language translated book that could hold the book and category for illustrations. Thank you in advance! Plaga med (talk) 12:09, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Plaga med: Empty categories are routinely deleted, unless a redirect is really useful. Yann (talk) 13:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. Then I can recreate the page and populate it? Plaga med (talk) 13:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Plaga med: Yes, fine. Yann (talk) 13:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good, Thank you! Plaga med (talk) 13:29, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for creating Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vicky Sylvester Mnguember.jpg from my original nomination. That has given the chance for other eyes to see it. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:45, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy noms

Hi Yann, why don't those images qualify for speedy? Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 17:38, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Voorts: I can't access the source, but if these images were published at that time, the license is plausible. Now if they were only first published recently, they are no OK. And in this case, it seems better to create one DR only for them all. Yann (talk) 08:36, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Le Double Amour (1925), affiche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

hinnk (talk) 03:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Videos2commons once again

"An exception occurred: DownloadError: b'ERROR: unable to download video data: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden'"

Any clue how to fix? Trade (talk) 17:55, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Trade: Hi, V2C is broken is several ways. If you know Python, your help would be greatly appreciated. Otherwise, just restart your task, or wait for the tool to be fixed. Yann (talk) 20:15, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did restarting worked for you? Trade (talk) 20:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade: Sometimes, yes. Yann (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Have you noticed that there seems to be specific channels that evade the errors? Trade (talk) 20:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade: Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. "specific channels"? Yann (talk) 20:40, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
YouTube channels of course Trade (talk) 20:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Trade: No, I have never seen a relation between a specific channel and V2C errors. Results mostly depend on the video size. Small videos (< 500 MB) are usually OK. Big videos (> 2 GB) usually fail. In between, it varies. Yann (talk) 20:53, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection request for File:Brown rat distribution.png

Hello, Yann.

Can you temporarily protect File:Brown rat distribution.png (which you did back in January, for a duration of two months)? I reverted the map (which is used by numerous articles across Wikipedia) to its original upload version. Other users put the man-made boundaries of Alberta to the map, depicting the whole province as devoid of the species brown rat (rattus norvegicus), which is false and baseless. This large province has a population of brown rats, and they do not stop at its invisible border. Brown rats are detected in the province and are often reported in the news.

Yours sincerely, Oirattas (talk) 19:51, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you reverted a map that neutrally says that it is disputed that brown rats are in Alberta and you did not explain the revert there. English Wikipedia has text that there are no brown rats in Alberta. I'm skeptical of the claim, but can we keep the version that says it's disputed? Abzeronow (talk) 21:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The SVG version shows the unfounded claim of Alberta being "rat free". The PNG map (which numerous Wikipedia articles already use) should remain the original way it was uploaded, without the man-made borders of Alberta. The later dubious addition of Alberta in the map, was the reason why the PNG map was removed in the English Wikipedia article en:brown rat. Oirattas (talk) 01:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Harcourt

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Copyright_status_of_photos_by_French_photo_studio_Harcourt

Bonjour Yann,

Dans cette discussion, les mentions © publiées par RMN sont prises comme preuves alors que RMN et d'autres ressources publiques font souvent des copyvio. Si tu voulais bien confimer ce point dans la discussion ? Belle journée. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 11:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, c'est vraiment n'importe quoi. Les mentions © de RMN n'ont aucune valeur. Yann (talk) 12:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please respond about Harcourt at COM:AN.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Sorry to be here, being a non technical person , could not find any other way to reach you , you deleted below page on merit , means you are a true professional .

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Obaid_Azhar.jpg?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0AywnVMjoTRe8BLIS-kuIqHkYdKWJ7ZN_VnzJa2k2a5085zBa9hnAsNUM_aem_1IyRPxnyEF42_JuM2nQGgw

Please also review on merit below page belonging to same person , this is personal advertisement only, they are misusing it to scam public by giving misleading info on this platform with a very good SEO rating. Please give some time and review it thoroughly. Public will be obliged.

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mian_Muhammad_Azhar_Ansari.jpg Kevenswodolkski (talk) 18:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:05, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP?

File:10 Downing Street. MOD 45155532.jpg? 13:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olivia de Havilland, actress, 1985.jpg? 02:27, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please

I couldn't create the source so I included own or where I got it please don't delete it I made everything for days I Kadékk Gilang (talk) 07:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I Kadékk Gilang (talk) 07:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no need to post a message here. Yann (talk) 07:43, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yann,

I hereby confirm that I am Oleksandr Kurmaz (Sasha Kurmaz), the author of the exclusive copyright to the media work as listed here:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sasha_kurmaz_portrait_2023.tif

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Temple_of_the_Transfiguration_Sasha_Kurmaz.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maria_Prymachenko.png

and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Please restore all files that you deleted or marked for deletion.

Oleksandr Kurmaz 27.07.2024 Anonymous-anonym (talk) 09:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Anonymous-anonym: Hi, Please send the permission via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 10:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done! Thanks for the quick reply. Anonymous-anonym (talk) 13:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yann, this image was published by the Venezuelan government and according to the legislation and laws of the country, the image is in the public domain due to the official use that is given to it by entering Pd-Venezuela, in fact the template that had Wilfredor (talk) 13:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 19:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Yann Wilfredor (talk) 20:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Juste PVI, putting that image in the right article resulted in global block of Wikipedia au Venezuela. Merci encore [1] Wilfredor (talk) 23:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Wilfredor: How sad and silly! If it was published by the Venezuelan government, why do they care about its publication on WP? Is the WMF informed about this? I know the WMF likes to document and respond to censorship events. Best, Yann (talk) 07:38, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, WMF is aware of this. It's not just Wikipedia, they have blocked many pages that show any negative content about the government. Thank you for your concern. Wilfredor (talk) 21:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming of copyvio graphic war image (NSFW)

What do you suggest we do? Trade (talk) 14:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Trade: Could you be a bit more explicit? Yann (talk) 12:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Image Under Deletion Request Appeal

You deleted File:TEXRail Map.jpg which was initially tagged for speedy deletion by a user, but they incorrectly attributed the source of the image which they claimed was where the copyright violation was from. This was incorrect and I filed an appeal here per the instructions on the speedy deletion template.

I can be corrected, but an image shouldn't be deleted while it's in the hands of the community so to speak, where they're input is being asked for, especially since the logic of the user that initially reported the image for speedy deletion was offbase.

Baseball Watcher (talk) 12:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Baseball Watcher: Hi, If you want to contest the deletion, you should do it here. Yann (talk) 20:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File to be deleted

Hello Yann,

Can you please delete the file "File:Namibia LGBT+ Flag.png" I uploaded in June, it was brought to my attention that the design is in fact copyrighted under Namibian law. Evidence can be found here at the creator's twitter account. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 17:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cdjp1: Please create a deletion request. Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah that's where it is, apologies. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 20:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Elvis Presley, Modern Screen, June 1958.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elvis Presley, Modern Screen, June 1958.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]