Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
55,805 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 50,201 (90%) 
Undecided
  
 3,105 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,499 (4.5%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-07-25 07:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio dardanus cenea (Mocker swallowtail) female form cenea dorsal
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-07-25 07:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio dardanus cenea (Mocker swallowtail) female underside form cenea

 Comment Scope is a red-linked CAT --Tagooty (talk) 15:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Tim Landy (talk) on 2024-07-25 09:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Oxford Spanish Civil War Memorial

 Oppose Wrong perspective, the subject isn't well ilustrated, and there is another photo with best lightning Ezarateesteban 12:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 0 support, 2 oppose =>
declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ezarateesteban on 2024-07-25 15:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of Our Lady of Luján, in Iglesia Sagrada Eucarisitia, Buenos Aires, Argentina
See the scope, please Ezarateesteban 12:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2024-07-25 16:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Welsh mounting block
Reason:
In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, mounting blocks were used by the gentry to help them mount their horses. I believe that this image of a mounting block located outside the church in Nevern is the best image that we have of such pieces of Welsh road furniture. -- Martinvl (talk)

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-07-25 16:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Flower of one Rehmannia piasezkii in the greenhouse of Hortus Haren (Groningen)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2024-07-25 17:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Nevern High Cross
Reason:
I believe that this is the best image in Commons depicting this 10th or 11th Century monument. -- Martinvl (talk)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2024-07-25 17:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:St David's Cathedral - Misericords
Reason:
I believe that this is the best image in Commons depicting a misericord in this cathedral -- Martinvl (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
JustEMV (talk) on 2024-07-25 20:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of José Olaya
Used in:
en:José Olaya, es:José Olaya

{{[cmt}} and mention the artist. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-26 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Ritratto di magistrato con puttino by Alessandro Longhi (Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia)
Reason:
 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 09:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC) -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-26 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Le Marchand d'huile by Antonio de Puga - Goya Museum
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-26 05:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Ritratto di figura femminile seduta - Giovanni Boldini
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ReneeWrites (talk) on 2024-07-26 08:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Grave monument of Jan I van Nassau
Used in:
nl:Jan de Bastaard van Nassau
  •  Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 09:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  OpposeWho was Jan I of Nassau? This image, produced by the Rijksdienst voor Cultureel Erfgoed (National Service for Cultural Inheritances) catalogues this tomb as being of an unknown person. The article en:John I, Count of Nassau-Siegen catalogues him as having been buried in burried Keppel Abbey, Germany. The tomb might be that of en:John IV, Count of Nassau-Siegen who was certainly buried in Breda, but we need more evidence to show that the "official" description has (see earlier) been updated. BTW, the links in Category:Grave monument of Jan I van Nassau should point to articles in Wikipedia, not to Commons categories. Martinvl (talk) 20:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Martinvl: Jan I was an illegitimate son of John IV. A bit more information on the grave (and the person) can be found on the website of Erfgoedweb here. Erfgoedweb (Lit. Heritage Web) is run by the municipality of Breda in cooperation with the city archive (whose logo can be seen in the bottom left). From the bottom paragraph:
    Jan the Bastard was buried on 29 November 1505. He is depicted on his grave monument in a shroud, stripped of all signs of dignity. The monument was hidden for a long time under a wooden floor and was rediscovered in 1902, attracting a lot of attention at the time. The inscription with the name of the deceased was placed on a copper strip that disappeared over time. For a long time, it was therefore unknown who was buried here, but historian Valentijn Paquay has shown, based on archival research, that this is Jan the Bastard.
    The page doesn't mention a date, but this page from a book about the church mentions the results of Paquay's research being published in 1999, the photo from the Rijksdienst is dated 1995. ReneeWrites (talk) 00:02, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Explanation accepted. A pity that no reference was made to Paquay in either Commons or Wikipedia (en or nl). I will be updating the category description in due course so that your explanation is properly recorded. BTW, in English we use the word “tomb” rather than “grave-monument”. Martinvl (talk) 12:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Martinvl: ✓ Done Added coordinates. ReneeWrites (talk) 17:59, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Great! "Oppose" flag removed. Martinvl (talk) 20:02, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-07-26 15:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Chah, Zanskar
Used in:
wikidata:Q127767415
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-07-26 21:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Begging is forbidden plaques in Thièvres (Pas-de-Calais), view from Grand Rue
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-27 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
The departure from Rome - Storie di sant'Orsola by Tommaso da Modena - Complesso di Santa Caterina - Treviso
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-27 05:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint John the Evangelist by Francisco Varela - Goya Museum
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-27 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Signora con piume rosa 1925 - Alberto Martini

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 06:09, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-07-27 05:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Stod-Doda River in Padum valley
Used in:
wikidata:Q923829 • ar:نهر دودا • ca:Doda • en:Doda River
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 2024-07-27
Scope:
Suada swerga swerga (Indian Grass Bob) - ventral
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ReneeWrites (talk) on 2024-07-27 11:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Pastorie, Sint-Laurentiuskerk (Ulvenhout)
Used in:
nl:Sint-Laurentiuskerk (Ulvenhout)
Thanks for the review. I've stopped using the .png file format for images like these since about a year and a half ago, but this is one of my older images which still has it. ReneeWrites (talk) 08:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 2024-07-27
Scope:
Arhopala perimuta perimuta (Sylhet Yellowdisc Tailless Oakblue) - ventral
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 2024-07-27
Scope:
Elymnias penanga chelensis (Khasi Pointed Palmfly) - ventral
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-07-27 22:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Plaques de cocher in Seninghem, view from rue Principale ( Pas-de-Calais)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sigamix (talk) on 2024-07-27 22:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Power lines in France
  •  Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image. It would be better to specify Electric pylons in the Drôme seen from the Chem. des Joncs, Pierrelatte..--Pierre André (talk) 10:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-28 04:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Sant'Agnese - The facade - Treviso Italy
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-28 04:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Sign of the art of the Scorzeri (tanners) - Correr Museum
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-28 04:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Giacomo Grosso - Rêve d'or - Museo d'arte moderna (Venice)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-07-28 12:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Nissan NV300 - right front view
Used in:
de:Renault Trafic, en:List of Nissan vehicles, uk:Nissan Primastar, uk:Nissan NV300
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-07-28 16:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Muntsjestege 10, Wierum Front facade.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-07-28 17:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Eurytela dryope angulata (Golden piper) dorsal
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-07-28 20:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Graphium colonna (Black swordtail) side view

 Support Unusual, but very interesting shooting angle. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-07-28 20:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Papilio constantinus constantinus (Constantine's swallowtail) female underside
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-29 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Il Canal Grande verso Cannaregio con la Chiesa di San Geremia, Palazzo Labia e il ponte delle Gulie by Il Canaletto (Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-29 05:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Torse de femme (Woman's torso) by Pablo Gargallo - Bronze - Musée Goya
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-29 05:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Ritratto di figura femminile seduta - Giovanni Boldini
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-07-29 08:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Testa village, Zanskar - close view from south
Used in:
en:Testa, Zanskar
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-07-29 08:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Jammu Tawi railway station - aerial view from the northeast
Used in:
en:Jammu
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ReneeWrites (talk) on 2024-07-29 09:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Facade of Villa Vredenburcht in Bréda
Used in:
nl:Lijst van gemeentelijke monumenten in Breda
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-07-29 10:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Plaques de cocher in Moringhem, view from Rue Principale
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-07-29 10:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Maxime de Grand Difques (Moringhem), view from Rue du Bois, Pas-de-Calais
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Tournasol7 (talk) on 2024-07-29 11:33 (UTC)
Scope:
Building at 85 Grand'Rue in Turckheim
Used in:
fr:Maison au 85, Grand-Rue à Turckheim
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Tournasol7 (talk) on 2024-07-29 11:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Building at 62 Grand'Rue in Turckheim
Used in:
fr:Maison au 62, Grand-Rue à Turckheim
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-07-29 15:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercenaria campechiensis (Southern Quahog), right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-07-29 15:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercenaria campechiensis (Southern Quahog), left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-07-29 18:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Astrid - MMSI 230998670
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-30 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman statues in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Artemis
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-30 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo dei Trecento of Treviso, Italy. Monumental wooden monastic lectern.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-07-30 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
The Marriage of the Virgin by Alonso Cano - Goya Museum
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
ReneeWrites (talk) on 2024-07-30 06:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Grafmonument Engelbrecht I van Nassau - Maria van Loon-Heinsberg and John IV of Nassau with saints
Used in:
nl:Maria van Loon-Heinsberg
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 07:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   
Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=751225986"